![]() ![]() Younger age, better working memory, and stronger belief in effective mnemonic strategies predicted better recognition, whereas instructional intervention attenuated associative memory deficits, with some persistence over time. Using continuous-time dynamic modelling, we assessed change in item and associative recognition, intervention effects, and their relations with age, sex, meta-memory beliefs, working memory, and metabolic health. Starting with the third occasion, we instructed participants to use an effective mnemonic strategy (sentence generation). Testing was repeated every two years, 5 times. ![]() ![]() In a longitudinal study of 276 healthy adults aged 18-79 years, we tested associative and working memory, and assessed beliefs regarding mnemonic strategies. However, whether imparting such strategy suffices for mitigating memory differences is unclear. Age-related memory decrements correlate with metacognitive declines, including knowledge and deployment of effective mnemonic encoding strategies. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |